The cost of not doing debris remediation
Id: 309
Type: Conference paper
Published: 10/22/2019
Event: International Astronautical Congress 2019
Authors:
Click an author to filter the list of related assets below.Abstract:
Efforts to manage the growth of the orbital debris population have focused on debris mitigation activities such as limiting the lifetime of objects after operational use; eliminating generation of debris from deployment and operations; and ensuring that reentry of debris poses an acceptable risk to people and property on the ground. Examination of these debris mitigation activities worldwide have shown some positive effects on the debris environment. However, efforts to pursue debris remediation operations, such as active debris removal (ADR), have been limited largely to technology demonstrations to date. A limiting factor to ADR implementation has been its cost. Rather than trying to estimate the cost of ADR operations, this paper examines the costs of not urgently implementing debris remediation countermeasures such as active debris removal (ADR) or just-in-time collision avoidance (JCA). The current analysis of the most likely massive-on-massive collisions in low Earth orbit (LEO), as characterized by the ongoing Massive Collision Monitoring Activity (MCMA), is used to identify two plausible scenarios for debris-generating events and their collision risk to the population of operational satellites. The interaction of the likely massive collision events and the current operational payload population is examined to estimate the cost to the global community if inaction in debris remediation activities continues. The “cost” of these events will include (1) direct loss of satellite capability from lethal nontrackable (LNT) debris collision risk and (2) collision avoidance (CA) burden on operational satellites. It is hoped that the results of this paper will encourage the aerospace community to actively pursue the development of debris remediation options.
Keywords:
Click a keyword to filter the list of related assets below.Citation:
McKnight, D., Oltrogge, D.L., Alfano, S., Shepperd, R., Speaks, S. and Macdonald, J., “The cost of not doing debris remediation,” IAC-19,A6,2,7,x48725, 70th International Astronautical Congress, 22 October 2019, Washington, D.C, accessible at https://comspoc.com/Resources/Content/Private/C-20220430T115608/Paper/IAC-19,A6,2,x48725.pdf.
Papers with related authors:
LEO constellation encounter and collision rate estimation: an update
Read MoreUsing Spacebook and Cesium to Promote and Enhance Flight Safety
Read MoreActionability and Persistence Of Conjunction Data
Read MoreActionability and Persistence of Conjunction Data
Read MoreSpace Traffic Coordination Framework for Success
Read MoreSynthetic Covariance Production Using a New Digital Approach
Read MoreActionability and Persistence of Conjunction Data
Read MoreComparison of predicted and observed spacecraft encounters from Russian ASAT test
Read MoreIdentifying Critical LEO Kinetic Space Safety Activities
Read MoreEfficient assessment of long-term encounter rates with CSSI’s volumetric encounter method
Read MoreRussian ASAT Debris Cloud Evolution and Risk
Read MoreEvaluation of LEO conjunction rates using historical flight safety systems and analytical algorithms
Read MoreInnovative LCOLA tool prioritizing accuracy, launch access and efficiency
Read MoreSSA positional and dimensional accuracy requirements for Space Traffic Coordination and Management
Read MoreRisk Assessment of Recent High-Interest Conjunctions
Read MoreResults of comprehensive STCM data fusion experiment
Read MoreRisk Assessment of Recent High-Interest Conjunctions
Read MoreThe technical challenges of better Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic Management
Read MoreProbability of Collision: Valuation, variability, visualization, and validity
Read MoreA comprehensive assessment of collision likelihood in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit
Read MoreProbability of Collision: Valuation, Variability, Visualization, and Validity
Read MorePractical issues with using a full gravity field
Read MoreThe TraCSS Consolidated Pathfinder: Leveraging Commercial Capability in LEO
Read MoreDeep operator and SSA collaboration for space sustainability
Read MoreInternational standards development activities supporting UN COPUOS LTS guidelines
Read More2023 Updated Space Safety Coalition Best Practices for the Sustainability of Space Operations
Read MoreAddressing the debilitating effects of maneuvers on SSA accuracy and timeliness
Read MoreProtecting the Operational Environment for SmallSats in the presence of Space Debris and ASAT Testing
Read MoreSustainable Coexistence in Space: How CubeSats and Small Satellites Fit in our Current Space Governance Framework
Read MoreDEEP OPERATOR AND SSA COLLABORATION FOR SPACE SUSTAINABILITY
Read MoreAwareness-raising and capacity building related to implementation of LTS Guidelines, §II.B: Safety of Space Operations
Read MoreAchieving Space Sustainability through Intense Operator and SSA Collaboration
Read MoreSpacecraft Safety Made Stronger: Taking the Space Data Center to the Next Level
Read MoreStandards considerations for a space domain where humans will travel to, live in, and work.
Read MoreAssessing passive radar for LEO SSA
Read MoreSpace Situational Awareness from the Commercial Perspective: COMSPOC, SDA, and SSC
Read MoreSpace Traffic Management: On the topics of Data Fusion and Shared Catalogs
Read MoreASAT tests: Adverse implications to operators and the space environment
Read MoreSpacecraft brightness: Best practices, guidelines and impact on Space Situational Awareness
Read MoreInternational, Inter-Agency and space industrial leadership roles impacting space operations
Read MoreSpace Traffic Coordination and Management Special Session
Read MoreThe contributions of commercial best practices to the global space governance continuum
Read MoreBook Chapter for A Closer Look at Space Debris: “Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic Management”
Read MoreSSA DEGRADATION FROM LARGE CONSTELLATIONS: A STARLINK-BASED CASE FOLLOW-ON STUDY
Read MoreSSA degradation from large constellations: A Starlink-based case study
Read MoreCharacterizing the India ASAT Debris Evolution Using Diverse, Complementary Tools
Read MoreDebris Risk Evolution And Dispersal (DREAD) for post-fragmentation modeling
Read MorePractical considerations and a realistic framework for a Space Traffic Management system
Read MoreA comprehensive assessment of collision likelihood in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit
Read MoreFragmentation event debris field evolution using 3d volumetric risk assessment
Read MoreSample evaluation criteria for space traffic management systems
Read MoreApplication of New Debris Risk Evolution And Dissipation (DREAD) Tool to Characterize Post-Fragmentation Risk
Read MoreUsing space population models to generate representative space object catalogs
Read MoreEfficient solutions of kepler’s equation via hybrid and digital approaches
Read MoreSpace Monitoring Presentation: Improved SSA & RFI Mitigation via COMSPOC
Read MoreUpdated Analytical Partials for Covariance Transformations and Optimization
Read MoreMulti-Phenomenology Observation Network Evaluation Tool (MONET)
Read MoreParametric Characterization of SGP4 Theory and TLE Positional Accuracy
Read MoreCommercial Space Operations Center (ComSpOC): A Commercial Alternative for Space Situational Awareness (SSA)
Read MoreEfficient Solutions of Kepler’s Equation Via Hybrid and Digital Approaches
Read MoreStandardization by ISO to ensure the sustainability of space activities
Read MoreEffective Strategies for Satellite Communications RFI Mitigation
Read MoreManeuver event detection and reconstruction using body-centric acceleration/jerk optimization
Read MoreDetermination of orbit cross-tag events and maneuvers with Orbit Detective
Read MoreEphemeris Requirements for Space Situational Awareness
Read MoreAnalysis of the response of a space surveillance network to orbital debris events
Read MoreStandardized Approaches for Estimating Orbit Lifetime after End-of-Life
Read More